By David Petlansky

Yesterday, 2 bombs, packed with ball bearings, exploded at the finish line of the Boston Marathon, leaving 3 dead and over 100 wounded.  The official story reports that a third bomb was located 1 mile away by the Boston bomb squad where they rigged it with explosives and initiated a “controlled explosion."

 Nobody has yet claimed responsibility for what President Obama is saying will be treated as an "Act of Terror."  There are some interesting details about this story that are comparable to other "terrorist" attacks, that should raise some eye brows.

Bomb Squad Was Running A "Controlled Explosion" On The Same Day

As the Boston Globe tweeted, “Officials: There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.”

Despite police refusing to acknowledge that they had any warning of the bombing attack on the Boston Marathon, eyewitness Ali Stevenson says authorities “must have known” of a threat because they announced a drill beforehand and had spotters on the roof at the start of the race.

“They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

There are two reasonable explanations for this:

1) Someone called in a warning and threatened to bomb the event, which is why the bomb squad was on scene.

2) The bomb squad carried out the bombing as a false flag operation to achieve a political goal (unleashing TSA on the streets, blaming right wingers, increasing the bomb squad budget, etc.).

For explanation number one: If a credible threat had been called in, why didn't the Boston police cancel the marathon or try to warn runners about the security threat? Is it their policy to allow people to jog right into a massacre they've already been warned about?

For the second explanation, there are all sorts of reasons why the Boston bomb squad might have placed the bombs at the marathon. It could have been a drill that went terribly wrong (i.e. no explosions were planned but they accidentally went off), or it could have been a deliberate attempt to terrorize the American people and justify armed TSA agents on the streets for all future sporting events.

One thing anybody who studies false flag attacks knows for certain is that they usually are carried out alongside drills or "practice runs" consisting of similar scenarios.

DHS Buys "No Hesitation Targets" Along With Over 2 Billion Rounds Of Ammunition.

What Is To Gain?

Although it’s still a bit early to know for certain, this looks more and more like a planned event to be used as a pretext for the President to call for TSA agents to be on the streets at all future sporting events.
And that, in turn, is the run-up to the TSA occupation of America, which has always been the goal of Obama, who announced during his campaign that he wanted to build a  “civilian national security force.”

The fastest way to build a domestic national security force is to stage domestic bombings as a pretext.  Remember, that's how we ended up with the Patriot Act.

Also, don't forget that DHS has now purchased over 2 billion rounds of ammunition to be used domestically, against the American people (The number was 1.6 but has now been upgraded to over 2 billion.) as well as shooting targets designed to look like average Americans. (Shown in image above.)

Time Will Tell...

Regardless of what you might think is behind this right now, the real proof will be found in what Obama calls for in response to the bombings.

If he calls for TSA on the streets of America to “keep everybody safe” at sporting events, then it’s all clearly a false flag rolled out for a political purpose. It was all a pretext to justify a TSA lockdown.

If the bombing is used to frame and blame veterans, patriots or “right-wing extremists,” then it’s clearly a false flag, too. Veterans and patriots have been severely demonized by the Obama administration as well as the leftist media.

If the administration avoids using the bombings to roll out its political agenda, then it might have legitimately been a random terrorist attack by a deranged individual. We’ll have to wait and see what Obama calls for in reaction to the attacks in order to know their true political purpose.


Leave a Reply.